One of the most important issues in modern societies is to keep the FAMILY and various aspects of preserving the formation and stabilization of FAMILY have always been considered in different parts of authority including legislation, execution, and law. One of the most important aspects that can play a main role in keeping the FAMILY is employment. There should be arrangements in the legislation and policies related to the employment, status of FAMILY, stabilization of FAMILY, and being FAMILY-oriented in the area of legal and legislative systems of the countries' employment. This study applied a descriptive-analytical method to investigate the status of FAMILY in the employment LAWS. The results demonstrated that, nowadays, most governments have identified the importance of creating FAMILY-oriented arrangements that are accessible to all employees in their policy-making related to employment. In addition, the Islamic Republic of Iran, following the Sharia, has given lots of importance to the FAMILY and reproduction, and has paid attention to the FAMILY-oriented policy-making related to employment; although the implementation of these policies is faced with many executive and legal obstacles.

The increasing complexity of immigration LAWS globally has profound effects on FAMILY reunification processes, often resulting in significant emotional, legal, economic, and social challenges for immigrants. This study aims to explore the impact of these LAWS on FAMILY reunification, specifically examining the personal narratives and experiences of affected families. The objective is to understand the multi-dimensional consequences of immigration policies on FAMILY dynamics and well-being. This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews with 22 participants who have directly experienced the FAMILY reunification process under current immigration LAWS. Participants were selected through snowball sampling and outreach via immigrant advocacy groups, ensuring a diverse representation in terms of age, gender, and origin. Data collection aimed for theoretical saturation and was analyzed using NVivo software to identify themes related to the impacts of immigration LAWS on FAMILY reunification. Four main themes were identified: Emotional Impact, Legal and Administrative Barriers, Economic Consequences, and Social and Cultural Integration. Emotional impacts included stress, anxiety, loss, resilience, and effects on children. Legal and administrative barriers highlighted the complexity of legal processes, issues with accessibility of resources, and the implications of frequent policy changes. Economic consequences focused on financial strain, employment challenges, and housing instability. Social and cultural integration covered challenges related to cultural adaptation, community support, discrimination, stigma, and FAMILY dynamics. The study reveals that immigration LAWS intricately affect the emotional and psychological health, economic stability, and social integration of immigrant families. The findings underscore the need for policies that consider the profound human impacts of immigration LAWS, advocating for reforms that facilitate smoother and more humane FAMILY reunification processes.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate FAMILY reunification in Imami jurisprudence and to evaluate the positive effects of LAWS in order to reunite the foundations of the FAMILY. Materials and Methods: The type of method in this research is analytical-descriptive, which is based on existing books and researches and experiences gained in this field. Findings: The rules governing good communication between couples are: observance of mutual rights and duties of spouses, cohabitation of spouses, inheritance of spouses from each other, obligation of the wife to perform the duties of marriage, financial independence of the wife, support of mothers during pregnancy, custody of children by parents, obligation of parents in raising their children, obligation in paying alimony to wife and children and respect for the child to parents and these are among the LAWS that have a positive effect on FAMILY strength and child rearing. Conclusion: The LAWS that are in line with the objectives of Article 1104 are: The couple cohabits and the man must consider the woman's whereabouts. Couples inherit from each other, and women, like men, have financial independence. (1118 BC) and the man is obliged to pay alimony to his wife and children according to Article 642 of the Penal Code. According to Law 1178, parents are also obliged to raise their children, and Law 1168 also refers to the custody and custody of children. Article 21 of the Constitution emphasizes the protection of mothers during pregnancy. The child must respect the parents.

Introduction: The FAMILY is the social institution, which is the first foundation of collective life. Considering the importance of the FAMILY and its legal system, the discussion of the FAMILY rights and its education can prevent the damage caused by the lack of familiarity with it; So, the purpose of this study was to feasibility study of FAMILY LAWS education in higher education from the viewpoint of LAWS professors. Methods: This research is applied in terms of purpose and based on data collection method, is a descriptive research-survey type. The statistical population included law professors in Iran. Sampling method was a simple random that 150 people were selected based on G-Power method. The Data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. Content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts and reliability of the questionnaire was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0. 88 which indicates the appropriate reliability of the tool. For analyzing the results, descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), and one-sample t-test and independent t-test statistical tests were used. Results: The results showed that professors agreed with the necessity and opportunity to education of FAMILY LAWS in higher education and well evaluated the teachers' attitudes on the education of FAMILY law in higher education. They believed that there was no serious threat in this regard, and the readiness of human resources is also considered to be favorable. Conclusion: According to the results of this research on the need to FAMILY LAWS education at university, in addition to other general lessons, FAMILY LAWS education could be paid more attention as a separate lesson.

The present study intends to provide answer for the question that whether legislators are able to enter ethics to the realm of law and establish ethical teachings in a law framework when legislating the LAWS and regulations related to families. Answering this question depends on illustrating the ethics-centered necessity in the field of FAMILY based on specific features of FAMILY and also clarifying the concepts of ethics and rights as well as the distinctions between both of them. As a result of specific features of families such as having FAMILY privacy and being emotional, the legal guarantees of this field lack the desired function and protecting the foundation of the FAMILY depends on moral-based behavior of the members. On the other hand, according to the fact that one of the characteristics of legal regulations is legal sanction, legislator cannot directly approve ethical teachings in a legal framework. Therefore, the legislator has adopted prediction of the judgment institution and development of supplementary rules as two major strategies to include ethics in the legal structure of FAMILY.

Studying the nature of natural LAWS is a central and basic investigation in philosophy of science which penetrates well into the boundaries of epistemology and metaphysics.One of the most but interesting subjects in this regard is the "uninstantiated LAWS". In this paper, after explaining two main viewpoints on the nature of natural lawa, the way they treat the problem of uninstantiated LAWS is reported and their shortcomings are laid bare.

The main objective of this paper is a comparative study on FAMILY law and government development programs in Iran and Malaysia. As governments can increase the capacity of the quintessential FAMILY benefit in social and political participation which is done by resorting to the direct and indirect ways to increase the authority of the institution and to avoid assuming the concrete and direct attention to the growth and promotion of the FAMILY to provide families and thus their obligations to provide appropriate play. In addition, despite the differences in political attitudes, understanding with regard to the identity and privacy of the FAMILY is inevitable and irrevocable. Reflection on construction and public works, and how the law and government policy officers do with regard to the accepted norms of state law and big and small obligations towards "FAMILY" would be helpful considering the statements mentioned in pathology and discover the consistency of the findings in order to communicate constructively and presenting a non-passive model of the state and the FAMILY. In this paper, we tried to focus on factors known to the international community and the collective wisdom in the field of governance. Their works were evaluated on the existence of the FAMILY.

The focus of this study is primarily on “the discrepancy in mentality as an important factor affecting FAMILY problems and divorce”. For this purpose, some minor studies were conducted each of which experimentally examined different aspects of mental discrepancy in Iranian families. Almost all of these studies showed that permanent disputes and divorces resulted from the differences in their world-views, thinkings, and impressions in their mutual affairs. At last, the theory of Homogamy with two major revisions were used to explain the reasons and causes of FAMILY problems and divorce which were confirmed in minor studies and cases.

FAMILY policy is a remarkable example of regulation in its special meaning. There are different theories and approaches to regulation in the Institution of FAMILY. In consideration of the state theory and the supporting theoretical basis, Iran and France’s States, have justified their FAMILY regulation based on the prioritizing public interest on individuals, public order and good morals, legal paternalism and legal moralism, protecting the rights and individual freedoms, especially for the minorities, guarantying human’s dignity, equality, justice, and considering The Harm Principle. However, there are fundamental differences between the two legal systems despite some similarities in the quality, the scope, and the basis (criteria) of the regulation in the Institution of FAMILY. Although the FAMILY is included in the governmental regulation, this needs to be exceptional, regulatory, protective, minimal, and based on the necessities, rationality, and law. The question of the survey besides the legitimacy of the regulation is about the methods and the territory of the FAMILY regulation.